>>8636I think a numpad's a little bit easier for people who don't know how to touch type. In one of my older jobs, I'd seen people who didn't touch type use a numpad proficiently. It's fairly intuitive, in contrast to the QWERTY layout, so, of course a functioning human being could intuit how to use one with their own devices. It kind of makes my wonder about whether, in a world with Dvorak, where people naturally gravitate towards the home row, or some kind of ABCDE layout, where people could anticipate where the keys were, whether there'd be so many computer-illiterate boomers and zoomers out there. It actually really depresses me how my nephews and neices will never what it's like to actually type and think about what you're typing, rather than being myopically fixed on the actual process of typing.
Notwithstanding, when I bust out emacscalc for arithmetic, conversions, statistics, I always use numrow. I might type a lot, but not that much in proportion to all the other stuff I type. But, I think it makes perfect sense why an accountant would use the numpad. Extending your fingers all the way out to the numrow, in my eyes, seems straining and un-ergonomic. I guess it just depends on the application.