>>11127>There is absolutely nothing insecure about a self-signed certificate, and some would argue it's more securethe point of a validated certificate is to make it harder for malicious ISPs (or other parties between anon and /what/) to replace the cert with theirs and decrypt the connection
consider this scenario:
1. anon types
https://what/ into web browser
2. isp sees this and connects to
https://what/ first
3. isp pretends they're /what/ and sends anon a different self-signed cert they just generated
4. isp is now connected to both anon and /what/ using "https", can now tunnel traffic between the two connections while reading all of it in plain text
anon never finds out because it shows the same self-signed warning as always
if /what/ used a proper certificate the isp couldn't do this because they can't get a trusted certificate authority to stamp them a valid cert for the domain without at least verifying ownership of it
it still provides some protection against passive snoopers but it is wrong to say it's not any less secure than proper https