/what/ - ...

You should stop polluting your mind with propaganda OP

Get them girlfriends?

I don't understand how someone working at a big tech company could be incel, they make so much money how could they be?

The primary thing adult women are attracted to in capitalist societies is financial status, then social influence and power, then looks.

>>28740
Tons of CS autists are virgins

Nothing as long as they continue to be profitable to shareholders.

>>28742
Male virgins are dangerous

>>28743
Are they dangerous to my company's profits? If not I honestly don't give a fuck.

>>28745
Once more feminist complain yes

>>28740
The primary thing women are attracted to with a man is that other women are attracted to him.
If you are an ugly (or even just average looking) autist you have to earn much much more than is possible with a good stable CS Job to be attractive to women (who are not ugly and/or dumb).

>>28740
>Get them girlfriends?
i think the implied solution is "fire them before they go full on r9k and start trying to murder chads and stacies"
you know, like that kid with the car

>>28758
"You're fired."
"Why?"
"You failed to meet your casual sex quota three months in a row."

I hate myself so much

>>28758
I don't think even they would be that dumb. Firing people who feel cheated by society and treated unfairly seems like it would only cause more shootings.

>>28779
yeah but when they inevitably snap it's not one of YOUR employees who did it
plus i mean they might shoot up their workplace or rape one of their coworkers in the parking lot or something

are "incels" really starting to become a thing normal people know about now?
can't wait 'till they start forcing me to wear a special virgin badge sawn on my clothes just because some /r9k/tard decided to play IRL carmageddon

>>28799
The safety of the majority out weight the needs for the minority.

>>28801
but I'm not an incel, I'm just a harmless virgin that doesn't even leave his house…

>>28801
This, a social outcast white male needs to be put on a watch list

>>28802
Yeah you totally aren't a human with sexual urges. Kill yourself freak.

>>28799
Look up incel on Google news. The entire world hates you for existing

There's nothing wrong with being an asexual virgin. I'm sorry, I should've made that distinction :(.

Being a non-asexual virgin, it's a huge red-flag that tells a lot about that person's personality.

>>28808
It tells a lot about their financial status.

90% of incels are incels because they're unemployed or don't make enough money.

You could have 9/10 looks and a great personality, but still be incel if you're unemployed, broke, have no car, no cell phone, and live with your mom or you're homeless.

The other 10% are incel because they're extremely ugly or severely mentally unstable.

Incel is primarily a product of late-stage capitalism.

How come I'm not surprised?

In an industry filled with thirsty kissless old virgins, of course that group will feel threatened by the arrival of more women. More people who will be able to tell them they suck, that they are without remedy, that they are disgusting to normal people? I'd feel threatened. Then again, they should feel threatened, because they are the kind of people (these pasty-white, socially inept, inexperienced neckbeards) that shouldn't be hired to begin with! Not women, but them! Their toxic personalities, which got them where they are now, and their disgusting hygienic standards (not to say anything about their unattractive looks) is the stuff that drove people away from them in the first place.

As a woman in tech, I'm sick and tired of dealing with social outcasts in an everyday basis. None of my non-STEM friends deal with things like this. Every time I talk to them about having to work with people with zero social skills, that don't share any interest in normal social events, that have zero social experience, that get creepy, that are the epitome of the neckbeard, I'm treated as though as I did work in some sort of hospice for the mentally challenged. They get to work and collaborate with normal, well-adjusted coworkers, which makes their work more fulfilling, makes them want to improve and get involved, and even have repercussions in their social lifes. Me? It's like dealing with freshmen from high school. And I dread the possibility of encountering them outside work. Like, fear-for-my-life level of dread.

The real problem with IT? It's filled with socially inept white men. Get rid of them, and see the industry boom. You think the Knuths, the Dijkstras, the Hamiltons, the Shockleys, the Moores or the von Neumanns of the past were socially unadjusted? They were normal people. They managed to get along with normal people. Chat, keep a conversation, date, get laid, party, go out on weekends. It's impossible to work with people who are better described as "androids trying too hard to forget they are in part humans". It simply doesn't work like that. Maybe in the future, when AI manages to take over the software industry, such an entity can be useful. But this industry basically demands that any newcomer becomes maladjusted. That is bound to backfire.

And you are seeing the backfire already. China is gaining ground. So does Europe. Places where the neckbeard, socially inexperienced virgin stereotype of an IT worker doesn't really exist. I've worked there with amazing and talented people who also knew how to relate to people, how to collaborate, how to work in groups, how to socialize. They were creative. That's why you see a drop in quality in Silicon Valley: they are hiring robot-wannabe, academics-obsessed manchildren who have known (or worse: cannot know) any other life than coding/software/engineering. Of course they are going to stunt. There's nothing new. No new ideas, no new worldviews. The same always-repeated mantras, dogmas, rule-of-thumbs and "deities"/idols they worship.

Again, the solution? It's not "hire more women/black people". It's stop hiring socially stunted, inexperienced, kissless virgins. Then women and minorities will flock back to you and you'll get several new sets of fresh eyes.

EDIT: Aaaaaand of course the creepy PMs are quick to arrive. Thanks for prooving my point :D

>>28809
This isn't true if the girl has a high paying career

>>28811
When men have high paying careers, they WANT an unemployed housewife.

When women have high paying careers, they still want a man who makes more money than them.

The MINIMUM they will settle for is an employed man who makes less than them, but they will never enter into a relationship with an unemployed broke man.

>>28812
None of this is true

>>28809
this is so far from being true I wonder if it's a joke

>>28810
didn't read lol

>>28808
I sometimes masturbate because it feels nice, am I okay or do I belong in the oven?

>>28840
You're not asexual

population control is my first reaction

>>28835
Red eases