No.25823
Yes absolutely.
I would have a meaningful job, house, wife, kids, and live in a racially homogeneous, high-trust, low-crime, non-feminist, socialist society.
I would not be as knowledgeable or wise as my current existence though, due to my NEET lifestyle and internet access (largest collection of information in history, infinite, constantly generating new info).
No.25824
I know that 'to suppose' is a dangerous line of thinking
No.25827
>>25823Nah, you'd still be a loser since you suck.
No.25845
I'd probably end up in the oven. Hitler hated work shy leeches. But I think the more important question to ask here is would this mean Japan wins the war as well and would the survival of the authoritarian Japanese regime allow for the existence and proliferation of asocial subcultures like the otaku who fuel anime production.
No.25849
Most likely, to win the war Hitler and the socialist would probably have been removed or he might have been removed after the war.
No.25850
There's no timeline where the Third Reich won.
No.25851
>>25850Actually there were many cases during the war where a different decision or action could have changed the outcome of the entire war, so if there was such a thing as alternate realities they would win in many of them, perhaps this is one of the few where they did not.
No.25852
>>25851They could have scored a military victory but their dictatorship would have collapsed eventually, freedom and democracy always prevails on tyrants.
No.25853
>>25852The freedom of Democracy is an illusion and the only reason it is so wide spread is because they won the war.
No.25854
>>25853Wrong, men inherently want to be free, they don't want to be controlled or constrained.
No.25855
>>25854They were happy to be controlled in Nazi Germany and they still get controlled and contained by Democracies.
No.25856
>>25855If they were so happy he wouldn't have needed to remove their civil rights such as freedom of speech or assembly or right to vote.
No.25857
>>25856Why did they get rid of freedom of speech in democratic governments then?
But anyway, the masses have always been controlled by small numbers of people who rile them up over some cause or other. Hitler would have wanted to make sure some other ideology could not try the same.
No.25858
>>25857You are mostly free to speak your mind nowadays, there are some exceptions but it's nothing compared to the pervasive control the state has on the media in totalitarian regimes.
No.25859
>>25858If I said anything right leaning or anti-gay I would be taken of air and possibly arrested.
No.25860
>>25859Yeah, I already mentioned there are some exceptions. I don't think that saying harmful things about gays is as important as being able to speak out against a dictatorship.
No.25862
I would probably end holocaust'd since I'm an asocial slavic man.
No.25863
>>25862south, west or eastern slav?
No.25865
>>25864yeah you would probably be a goner then or at the very best culturally germanized
No.25866
>>25860>I don't think that saying harmful things about gays is as important as being able to speak out against a dictatorship.I think it's more important to not have people decide what is important enough to be able to say.
No.25869
>>25866Sometimes saying certain things can cause harm to others or even their suicide, that's where speech stops being simple free expression and starts being more of a weapon to be used against others.
No.25875
>>25869Yes thank you whatmin ban the bully who posted that YouTube video on my thread
No.25930
>>25869>Sometimes saying certain things can cause harm to others or even their suicide, Then that's their own choice. It isn't murder to say things to someone to "make" them kill themselves.