No.7298
>>7231You what.
>>7205Present. I'll be back again this evening (9:00pm GMT).
No.7303
>>7302*pinches the fat on your ass*
thanks pal
No.7306
>>7305*pinches the fat on your mom*
thanks pal
No.7312
>>7306*pinches your dick*
thaks pal
No.7323
File: 1427589625834.png (507.31 KB, 720x540, u.png)
>>7322This is actually the first time I checked, 87 unique visitors just today.
28 of those are one guy with a million proxies though, and 7 of those are bots. So maybe like 50 actual unique visitors.
No.7325
>>7323Hey /what/min, am I your favorite poster? I don't use proxies, by the way.
Am I at least in the top 10 best posters??
No.7326
>>7324np
>>7325I don't look at posters like that, sry I don't know who you are. That was basically just anonymous data I got from the logs.
No.7327
File: 1427591485913.png (73.59 KB, 194x331, 1423458492269.png)
>>7326It's fine… sorry………..
No.7367
>>7361Can you get me these songs
Advance - Take Me To The Top
Touche - Wrap It Up
Orlando Johnson and Trance - Turn The Music On
James Otis White Jr - Baby Come On
Fox the Fox - Stretching Out
Or a what.cd invite and i'll do it myself
No.7374
>>7365>>7367https://www.whatinterviewprep.com/starting-the-interview/Just take the interview. You actually have to remember a lot of this stuff, but keep notes on some of stupid stuff, like the exact bitrate of certain types of MP3 formats.
If you take too long they'll think you're cheating btw, so just keep a small reference of stuff like the formats allowed, bitrates, etc.
No.7377
>>7373>>7375You can actually get banned for giving out invites to anyone with the sole exception of people on the restricted-invite sections of other private trackers. They actually enforce it too, and might even ban your account for legitimately inviting someone that does something wrong.
Now that I think of it they're kind of nazis about it. Just take the interview sry.
No.7393
File: 1427673213656.jpg (67.52 KB, 330x276, 44444.jpg)
>funk
No.7490
>>7481What a fucking slut
120 friends
MEGA SLUT
No.7512
>>7392My bad, didn't check SS.
>>7481…that profile is extremely out of date in terms of what I listen to regularly, it catalogs the last decade of music I've listened to (and not even as I've had to do several wipes of iTunes between then).
>>7490I feel bad not accepting when people add me.
No.7518
>>7513If you want, I won't be on it for a while though.
>>7514I don't give a hoot about RMS and the evil proprietary software, not one SINGLE HOOT.
No.7522
>>75211. They're teenagers / twenty-somethings who have a tumblr/ facebook (optional) and RYM (mandatory) and feel the need to update their profile talking about how cool and obscure they are
2. They think that listening to obscure music makes them have good taste in music
3. They think that others not listening to "obscure" music makes them have bad taste
4. They do that stupid bell curve rating system on RYM whereby a 2.5 is used for albums that otherwise would be considered eight or higher
5. They follow other avant teens like antiwarhol and that fat tumblrite who looks swole and base their taste on what they like/dislike
6. Complain about Pitchfork but like TMM and other avant teen online reviewers
7. Use music as a fashion accesory
8. Ironically like a popular (radio popular) album to show that they're "open minded"
Thankfully their trend is slowly dying but unfortunately they're being replaced by meme spouting post-ironic teens who purport to like music, which is worse.
No.7527
>>7525Essentially, which is why it's so easy to debase them as they have no base to start off with. The fact they put themselves in positions of "power" without any technical knowledge is enough to cement this.
I'm around mid twenties.
No.7535
File: 1427929020114.jpg (1.38 MB, 1315x1200, mgmt - congratulations - f….jpg)
Bretty good album I found on /mu/ a few days ago.
I only go on /mu/ every once in a while to search for new music. Most times I try that I leave with nothing. There is kind of problem where everyone likes stuff that could barely be considered music just because it's "deep".